Page 13 of 16

Re: Steel Project #4

Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:59 pm
by Bent
Storm, news to me about the nitro, and just goes to show I should keep my yap shut when I'm not sure :-)
Thanks for your remark!
Here is the fruits of today's labor...
polishbod2.jpg
polishbod2.jpg (91.63 KiB) Viewed 1704 times

Re: Steel Project #4

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:13 pm
by sheffield steel
Hi Guys,

MANY ROADS, BUT ONLY ONE DESTINATION.

HOW WE GET THERE IS NOT IMPORTANT, SO LONG AS THE END RESULT IS THE ONE YOU WANT, THAT IS ALL THAT MATTERS, IMHO.

BENT, SHE IS LOOKING MIGHTY FINE.

Dave. :D

Re: Steel Project #4

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:27 pm
by Storm Rosson
:D Yo brother Bent, I certainly didn't know when nitro lacquer came along, however I was curious so ....Wiki-pedia is our friend...hehehe. Dave, my thoughts perzactly......Stormy :mrgreen:

Re: Steel Project #4

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 10:06 am
by richard37066
Hey, Guys -

Educate this old man.

I reckemember from building a few classic guitars that ordinary lacquer is relatively soft. Is nitrocellulose a harder, more durable material? If so - and over the long run - would it be more susceptable to cracking, "checking"?

Richard

Re: Steel Project #4

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 3:13 pm
by Bent
Richard,
The lacquer I use is instrument lacquer, nitrocellulose based. The fact that it is "Instrument" means that it is formulated for acoustic guitars and so on - instruments with thin walls, prone to bending etc. The lacquer bends right along with the wood(to an extent) so this in turn prevents cracking and checking compared to other finishes. The tendency for bending etc is not as bad on a pedal steel made of way thicker material than an acoustic guitar(hey unless you have bad cabinet drop!!!)
The finish should not be thought of as soft, but rather flexible.
When I sanded it with 3 different grits (yes Pat, I went up to 1500) and 2 different grit swirl removers, I found out how hard it really is. Like they say: Harder than Japanese Arithmetic!

Re: Steel Project #4

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 8:01 pm
by richard37066
Bent -

Per usual, you explained it to my satisfaction. Won't hesitate to use it.

'Preciate it.

Richard

Re: Steel Project #4

Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 10:47 pm
by Bent
Quiet around here. Maybe everybody's busy with their project. I know I am. Can't think of anything else but to get this thing assembled, set up and adjusted. Another month and it HAS to be up and running.
Here are 3 pics from the assembly. Got the rodding almost done today - 9 hour day!
assemb~under.jpg
assemb~under.jpg (69.26 KiB) Viewed 1616 times
assembKhdend.jpg
assembKhdend.jpg (95.8 KiB) Viewed 1616 times
assemb~full.jpg
assemb~full.jpg (98.94 KiB) Viewed 1616 times

Re: Steel Project #4

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:36 am
by azureskys
Bent , that guitar sure looks good, whoever gets it is gonna be very happy Im sure . Russ

Re: Steel Project #4

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 1:56 pm
by richard37066
Bent -

Really like your changer mount and Alumitone pickup.

We've discussed string height above the fretboard before here on the forum and there's been no concrete reason for any dimension given. So be it.

Curious, though - what was your thinking in placing your strings so sky-high on this instrument? Was it dictated, in part, by your changer mount design?

Teach me.

Regards,

Richard

Re: Steel Project #4

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 2:32 pm
by Pat Comeau
Beautiful job Bent :) ,

is the bearing plate notch in the front apron?, the guitar is coming together real nice.


Pat C ;)