Re: some parts
Posted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 10:11 am
Russ, no, I used 3/4" diameter on the previous ones. The string rings on forever and with no buzz in the jig. But that's only one string - the G# .011.
I do see your point. I envision a HUGE diameter like 3" and I can see what you're saying. Like you say, it is a balancing act. You got me thinking now...
I'll keep plugging away.
Another problem I have always seen with the traditional finger...The string lays on it with only one contact point - the bottom of the string.
I have been told by an engineer that the ideal amount of contact points for a string, in order to maximize sustain, is two. In other words, a V-groove is needed, where the string contacts the finger on both sides and not the bottom. If this is the case, then there is a huge need for re-designing the whole finger.
I do see your point. I envision a HUGE diameter like 3" and I can see what you're saying. Like you say, it is a balancing act. You got me thinking now...
I'll keep plugging away.
Another problem I have always seen with the traditional finger...The string lays on it with only one contact point - the bottom of the string.
I have been told by an engineer that the ideal amount of contact points for a string, in order to maximize sustain, is two. In other words, a V-groove is needed, where the string contacts the finger on both sides and not the bottom. If this is the case, then there is a huge need for re-designing the whole finger.